Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2004 6:30 pm Post subject: The World's Dirty Little Secret
by Jack Engelhard
Mother Teresa never got anything like this. Albert Schweitzer never rated this riot of adoration, as did that pervert named Yasser Arafat.
Leaders from around the world paid him homage. Kings, presidents and prime ministers ripped their clothes in sorrow over his passing.
The United Nations lowered its flag. There is talk of naming a street after him somewhere in France.
Why do the nations grieve? In here there is a secret that dare not speak its name, but let's have it out.
Someone has got to tell it like it is, and I will take that risk.
They grieve for the man who was their number one killer of Jews. That's it in a nutshell. They lost Hitler and had nowhere to turn, until along came Arafat. They fed him billions of dollars each year, the nations did, to keep to the task, not to build, but to destroy, namely, Israel.
They knew the money wasn't going for roads or for schools. They knew exactly where it was going, and when he proved capable by blowing up yet another bus full of Israeli children going to school, they knew they had their man, and sent him more money.
Arafat's failing was that he lacked Hitler's machinery. Hitler was efficient. Arafat was crude. But second best is better than nothing.
Hitler mobilized a nation to murder the Jews. Arafat created a nation whose sole purpose was to murder the Jews.
Arafat had no gas chambers, so he turned his generation of children into an assembly-line of ticking bombs. Mothers were ordered to produce offspring in the service of death, rather than life. Hitler murdered millions. Arafat tried, but his victims, the murdered and the maimed, number in the thousands.
For this, they mourn; Arafat didn't finish up.
Gerhard Schroeder hinted at what it was all about. "It wasn't granted to Yasser Arafat to complete his life's work," said the German Chancellor.
Right, five and a half million to go, and the man elected for the job, gone, buried in Ramallah.
Schroeder spoke for much of the world, as did the BBC, when, unwittingly, it taught us the difference between bad Arab terrorists and good Arab terrorists. Bad Arab terrorists are those who are doing all that raping and killing in Darfur. The BBC swallowed its usual British reserve by describing those killers as detestable.
In a previous segment, the reporter pretty much used Kofi Annan's language in speaking of Arafat as a man who "symbolized in his person the national aspirations of the Palestinian people." Dignified words, but nothing, from this BBC reporter, that matched the image of what came across our TV screens - those mobs, those terrible mobs, grasping for that terrible casket. But these were the good terrorists, the terrorists that kill Jews, the terrorists the nations have consigned to live side-by-side with Israel in "peace and harmony."
After scenes like this, Israel should worry about its security?
To that BBC reporter, who put a shine over a scene so grisly one could only say, "Nice try, but, indeed, a picture is worth a thousand words."
The Los Angeles Times and others along the news media grapevine reminded us that Arafat was the only leader the Palestinians have ever known.
Surely they did not mean to put it quite like that, because then it's a giveaway - indeed, this Palestinian "nation" has existed for no more than forty years.
So, if they do admit this, then what "national aspirations" are we talking about? Forty years? For this they get Jerusalem? Forty years?
Israel's "national aspirations" go back nearly four thousand years.
Arafat's death gives us a glimpse, actually a moment of clarity, into the true nature of our world, and brings to mind Oscar Wilde's The Picture of Dorian Gray, wherein it is finally revealed that no gloss can cover-up the corrupted soul that lurks within man and the nations.
What a great article! I am sure it will be ignored by all that love the Palestinians.
It's a brilliant article - and probably hits too close to home for most to even acknowledge...
It's nice to know that I wasn't the only one who saw Arafat as Dorian Gray... _________________ He who is merciful with the cruel, will end-up being cruel to the merciful
- Kohelet Rabba 7:16
Just think how Hitler would have been honoured if we had given him breathing space -- a street in Paris [ because he refused to bomb it]
Nobel Prize for Economics and an Honarary cardinalship from the Vatican
Dont they see that Arafat was Hitler reincarnated!
Just think how Hitler would have been honoured if we had given him breathing space -- a street in Paris [ because he refused to bomb it]
Nobel Prize for Economics and an Honarary cardinalship from the Vatican
Dont they see that Arafat was Hitler reincarnated!
Of course they don't.... but just think - they could have stopped Hitler and bombed the railway lines to Auschwitz a long time before they actually decided to... _________________ He who is merciful with the cruel, will end-up being cruel to the merciful
- Kohelet Rabba 7:16
You're right - he was stopped in his tracks - and that's now why some of them are calling for the release of Barghouti... he could have continued Arafat's life work... but thank God Israel won't release him! _________________ He who is merciful with the cruel, will end-up being cruel to the merciful
- Kohelet Rabba 7:16
Posted: Tue Nov 16, 2004 10:55 pm Post subject: Re: The World's Dirty Little Secret
Nannette wrote:
by Jack Engelhard
Mother Teresa never got anything like this. Albert Schweitzer never rated this riot of adoration, as did that pervert named Yasser Arafat.
Leaders from around the world paid him homage. Kings, presidents and prime ministers ripped their clothes in sorrow over his passing.
The United Nations lowered its flag. There is talk of naming a street after him somewhere in France.
Why do the nations grieve? In here there is a secret that dare not speak its name, but let's have it out.
Someone has got to tell it like it is, and I will take that risk.
They grieve for the man who was their number one killer of Jews. That's it in a nutshell. They lost Hitler and had nowhere to turn, until along came Arafat. They fed him billions of dollars each year, the nations did, to keep to the task, not to build, but to destroy, namely, Israel.
They knew the money wasn't going for roads or for schools. They knew exactly where it was going, and when he proved capable by blowing up yet another bus full of Israeli children going to school, they knew they had their man, and sent him more money.
Arafat's failing was that he lacked Hitler's machinery. Hitler was efficient. Arafat was crude. But second best is better than nothing.
Hitler mobilized a nation to murder the Jews. Arafat created a nation whose sole purpose was to murder the Jews.
Arafat had no gas chambers, so he turned his generation of children into an assembly-line of ticking bombs. Mothers were ordered to produce offspring in the service of death, rather than life. Hitler murdered millions. Arafat tried, but his victims, the murdered and the maimed, number in the thousands.
For this, they mourn; Arafat didn't finish up.
Gerhard Schroeder hinted at what it was all about. "It wasn't granted to Yasser Arafat to complete his life's work," said the German Chancellor.
Right, five and a half million to go, and the man elected for the job, gone, buried in Ramallah.
Schroeder spoke for much of the world, as did the BBC, when, unwittingly, it taught us the difference between bad Arab terrorists and good Arab terrorists. Bad Arab terrorists are those who are doing all that raping and killing in Darfur. The BBC swallowed its usual British reserve by describing those killers as detestable.
In a previous segment, the reporter pretty much used Kofi Annan's language in speaking of Arafat as a man who "symbolized in his person the national aspirations of the Palestinian people." Dignified words, but nothing, from this BBC reporter, that matched the image of what came across our TV screens - those mobs, those terrible mobs, grasping for that terrible casket. But these were the good terrorists, the terrorists that kill Jews, the terrorists the nations have consigned to live side-by-side with Israel in "peace and harmony."
After scenes like this, Israel should worry about its security?
To that BBC reporter, who put a shine over a scene so grisly one could only say, "Nice try, but, indeed, a picture is worth a thousand words."
The Los Angeles Times and others along the news media grapevine reminded us that Arafat was the only leader the Palestinians have ever known.
Surely they did not mean to put it quite like that, because then it's a giveaway - indeed, this Palestinian "nation" has existed for no more than forty years.
So, if they do admit this, then what "national aspirations" are we talking about? Forty years? For this they get Jerusalem? Forty years?
Israel's "national aspirations" go back nearly four thousand years.
Arafat's death gives us a glimpse, actually a moment of clarity, into the true nature of our world, and brings to mind Oscar Wilde's The Picture of Dorian Gray, wherein it is finally revealed that no gloss can cover-up the corrupted soul that lurks within man and the nations.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Forum FAQ
Search
Usergroups
Favorites
Profile
Log in
